What I found unsettling about The Yellow Wallpaper was not so much the events in and of
themselves but their prelude: A man, and
a physician nonetheless, is convinced that because there is no detectable
bodily affliction to his wife, her “illness” is imagined and unwarranted. His
logic seems to be as follows: “If I go out of my way to relocate her to some
tranquil, beautiful location (and make a point of how much I am personally sacrificing to make this temporary relocation, as
an added flair of guilt-inducement) I can show her how baseless her
‘nervousness’ is.” I have found this a common attitude of those who are
ignorant regarding the realities of psychological disease – that depression,
eating disorders, etc. can simply be remedied by “putting on your big-girl
panties and getting over it,” and are simply excuses for laziness or weakness. John selfishly comforts himself (and simultaneously
confirms his own righteousness) by relocating –“he knows there is no reason to suffer, and that satisfies him
(3)” – and by manipulating his wife into feeling guilty for her “imposition” on
him -- “…he takes all care from me, and so I feel basely ungrateful not to
value it more…I mean to be such a help to John…and here I am a comparative
burden already (2, 3).” I realize the conflict of “belief vs. disbelief” is a
common theme in stories about the supernatural, but this particular tale seems
to hone in on the microcosm of that dilemma (the rejection of mental illness as
a farcical or exaggerated emotional “phase” akin to puberty -- note the childlike way John interacts with the narrator), on its mundane/domestic
origins, as the predecessor of the more fantastical events involving the
narrator being “incorporated into the wallpaper.”
No comments:
Post a Comment